TRANSMISSION

 

 

Introduction

​

Because human life is experienced as multi-dimensional, addressing the human condition calls for a multi-modal approach. Mind, psyche, and soul function as interrelated subsystems, while spirit, as their highest tier, is also the inherent condition through which all arise and unfold—permeating and sustaining them in a cascade of emanative overflow. Like striated folds within the smoothness of spirit, these subsystems are distinguishable by the way reality is constructed and disclosed within them, each imparting something irreducible to the totality of our experience. This manner of disclosure, in turn, determines their receptivity—and how they may be properly appealed to.

 

These strata—though interwoven in lived experience—are paradigmatically distinguishable. Each is shaped by its own epistemic window, receptive to a particular mode of sense-making—mediating, validating, and engaging with what is salient to it. What clarifies for the mind may not move the soul; what resonates in the heart may bypass rational analysis altogether. To appeal rightly is to speak in the logic proper to each stratum—a principle this chapter explores not by imposing a single paradigm, but by discerning the form of invocation each distinctively requires. Oriented toward their governing values—truth, goodness, or beauty—each stratum configures reality accordingly, culminating in a phase of unification. 

​​

 

Mind

 

Specialized in its cognitive function, the mind reaches a turning point in middle childhood, when self-consciousness becomes more pronounced and the 3rd-person perspective is differentiated—allowing one to see oneself as others might. This capacity to stand apart from subjective emotions and wishes reflects the emergence of an objective-observer stance, affording greater precision and a more strategic agency in relation to the external world, now perceived at arm’s length as an external ‘it’.

​

In parallel with this capacity for abstraction arises the focusing lens of objectification, wherein a seamless continuum of the phenomenal world is fragmented into discrete, isolable units—atomistic, isomorphic, and thus cognitively digestible. A univalent (1-to-1) correspondence between signs and referents enables symbolic representation: phenomena, once implicit and immersed in experience, are delineated, named, and brought into the foreground of awareness as explicit objects, free from overlap, ambiguity, nuance, gradation, or internal contradiction.

​

Building on this symbolic foundation, linguistic precision gives rise to truth claims—articulated as declarative statements, propositionally mediated by the exclusivity of binary logic as either categorically true or false. This forms the scaffolding for logically consistent inquiry and systematic reasoning.

​

Science, as the epistemic stronghold of this process, advances knowledge through empirical observation and rational analysis. Its method is traceable through a stepwise, linear fashion—from hypothesis to experiment, observation, and confirmation—testing theories through public procedures of validation. Theories, models, or maps are selected for their power of explanation, prediction, and control, warranted by the evidence and the inferences used to justify their claims.

​

And yet, no theory—however rigorous—can fully exhaust the complexity of reality. In accounting for the multiplicity of observable facts, reality cannot be shoehorned into any single framework without remainder, as some outlying datum—some anomalous tale—is always left out, becoming a shadow or unresolved paradox that, if unaddressed, engenders imbalance.

​

This limitation underscores the fact that some theories—or perspectives, more broadly—are more adequate than others. The formal-operational capacity for modern science and rational inquiry to analyze and structure the environment itself emerges through a developmental process, wherein the differentiation of the specialized mind allows the subject (observer) to step back and distinguish from the object (observed), breaking free from earlier embeddedness. This capacity for a 3rd-person perspective is not to be taken for granted; rather, it is a developmental milestone—one that highlights the importance of context in understanding not only theories, but also the perspectives from which they themselves are generated.

​

It is just this sensitivity to contexts—situational, historical, and cultural—through which the relativity of perspectives is cultivated, marking the shift from a 3rd-person perspective, which sees through the lens of objectivity, to a 4th-person meta-perspective, which begins to see the lens itself. As seen in models of personal growth—wherein the subject of one stage becomes the object of the next (Kegan, The Evolving Self)—a hierarchical orientation comes to define higher over lower , as each successive stage builds upon its predecessor along a unilaterally unfolding scale toward greater cognitive complexity and scope. As perspectives become objects of reflection, they are no longer simply held or inhabited, and the self is likewise no longer fully embedded within its own meaning-making. While such stages, as identified by developmentalists, contend with a proliferation of competing perspectives, the recursive turn may also drift from more embodied ways of knowing, as the so-called view from somewhere begins to dissolve—along with the stable footing beneath it—into a view from nowhere.

​​​

Following this developmental trajectory, skepticism of projection—whether through preference, bias, or the subtle distorting effects of unacknowledged lenses—becomes an impetus to step back further: beyond rational control, beyond meta-awareness, into a clearer seeing. Caught between perspectival multiplicity and the desire for resolution, the mind surveys all perspectives but cannot rest in any. By progressively removing oneself from the equation, an equanimity arrives that neither clings nor avoids—a spacious clarity that, rather than adjudicate, releases. In this culmination, the highest principle of detached observation is attained in impartiality, as the mind reaches its terminus: the supra-objective 5th-person Witnessing—Transcendental Consciousness.

​

At the gross-mental tier—where the mind stands in starkest contrast to the body’s grounding—a breakthrough may occur. A presence emerges around the headspace, offering a sense of abiding relief. Yet this transcendental vantage can deepen the divide, as the Witness perceives itself apart from the body-mind complex. It is a partial nonduality—a transcendental dualism—where clarity brings real freedom, yet a divide remains between upper and lower. The whole is not yet whole. Regardless of whether this terminus has been reached—whether one abides in the clarity of Transcendental Consciousness or operates instead from the relative clarity afforded by objective distance—the mind may see with crisp precision, yet leave us brittle—cut off from the force of life it cannot enter. Its clean divisions can name the world without touching it. To truly inhabit the world, we must not only describe it—but dwell within it. And so we turn to the psyche: not to analyze, but to participate.

 

 

Psyche 

​

By reading this sentence, you participate in a shared act of meaning-making that bridges the author’s intent with what you uniquely bring. Guided by motivations—whether instinctive or aspirational—our interpretation is shaped by underlying desires and expectations. The psyche dynamically perceives and interacts with its environment, reflecting both inter-subjective relationships with others and intra-subjective dialogues within ourselves. Through this relational participation—typically arising in early childhood—we semiconsciously differentiate a socio-emotional self, marked not by strict boundaries but by sensitivity to the perceived other, signaling the onset of a 
2nd-person perspective.

​

Immersed rather than standing apart, the psyche actively engages through mutuality, co-participation, or reciprocal exchange, allowing relational meaning to emerge. Rooted in shared values (ethos) and expressed in action (praxis), this mode of knowing shapes not only individual experience but also the shared culture that nourishes and sustains it.

​

This holistic approach emphasizes embodied meaning-making through texturally-rich experience (know-familiarity), skillful involvement (know-how), and directed aspiration (know-to). Taken together, these reflect a flex-flow orientation—favoring evocative-episodic modes (how experiences are internalized) and prescriptive-procedural modes (guiding actions and behaviors) over the detached abstraction of factual knowledge (know-about) as filtered through the descriptive-semantic lens of scientific observation.

​

To aid in our relational engagement with meaning, the psyche turns to bivalent symbols—rich in metaphor and layered association. Dual-natured images like the snake (death and rebirth), Janus-faced representations (threshold between perspectives), and the Taoist yin/yang (complementarity) highlight the ongoing exploration for psychic integration. These symbols reveal the dynamic interplay of opposing forces, illustrating how concepts like right and wrong are relative and dependent on context. Layers of meaning, if not reconciled, are at least recognized in dialectical tension, as we attempt to embody the ambiguities of our existence. Our acquaintance with this coincidence and conjunction of opposites brings us closer to the pulse of life—grounded in themes both cyclical and dynamic. Continuously re-engaging with our environment for feedback and recalibration, each cycle refines our response, deepening our living, breathing relationship with the world. 

​

Before the advent of the printing press, secular materialism, and rapid technological advancement, cultures depended on stories for survival, using them to make sense of the world and guide their way of life. Unlike propositional mediation, which employs explicit statements and logical analysis, narrative mediation conveys meaning implicitly, embedding collective wisdom in the rhythms of human relationships and lived experience. Through oral traditions, archetypes emerged—distilled from recurring patterns observed over generations—shaping behavior by inviting imitation and offering role models and universal templates for navigating life’s uncertainties. Rich in layered symbolism, these stories encoded and transmitted abstract ideals—like virtue, justice, and the meaning of life—by humanizing them within vivid, relatable tales that resonated with both daily struggles and aspirations. By fostering coherence and resilience across generations, narratives anchored communities in common meaning, cultivating cultural cohesion and identity. Grounding individuals in a collective sense of belonging and preserving a repository of values, stories provided a compass for navigating life’s challenges while connecting us to the enduring truths that sustain life and community. 

​

The psyche, as the embodied center of our lives, engages with the world not through detached observation but through direct, lived interaction. As the magisterium of moral meaning, religion channels this engagement toward a higher aim—the Summum Bonum, or supreme good—embedding archetypal morality and participatory rituals in service of an ultimate purpose. As both a forum of action and a mythos of meaning, religion calls us to sacrifice short-term gratification for long-term reward—extracting not just what secures our own self-preservation, but what best preserves the community that sustains us all. Faced with an overwhelming surplus of potential facts, religion helps us discern what truly matters by appraising our place in the whole through the lens of value. Here, truth is measured not by exhaustiveness, but by the good—that which proves most salient for navigating difficulty and attaining our goals.

​

Rather than privileging historical fact, religion conveys perennial truths—distilled across centuries of lived experience and durable across time. These truths are dramatized through allegories like Cain and Abel , who personify the spirit of grievance and gratitude—not as arid abstractions, but as existential templates for navigating life. Whether or not such a story is taken literally, its significance lies in its symbolic truth—in its psychological relevance to the human condition. By such archetypal orientations are our lives shaped—each dramatizing a fundamental posture toward existence and setting us on radically divergent paths. In this way, religion unites immediate experience with ultimate purpose, offering a cohesive framework that aligns with our deepest values and supports a unified psyche—countering the fragmentation that gives rise to moral decay and civilizational collapse. 
​

Perception is construed through our dynamic interaction with the world, as we adapt situationally to shifting conditions, attentive to how parts functionally fit within the larger whole while the whole nurtures and regulates its parts, allowing them to arise, flourish, and pass in their time. Much like an ecosystem, this relational mode of knowing operates in a flex-flow manner, maintaining balance through reciprocal feedback and dynamic equilibrium. This inter-dynamic balance, akin to the coordinated rhythm of walking, ensures stability even as it propels us forward. Rooted in organic systems, this bi-directionally integrative process fosters resilience and adaptive responsiveness, deepening our relationship with the living whole. By attuning to natural cycles and responding perceptively to environmental feedback, this approach promotes an ecological orientation—one that supports inter-generational flourishing.

​

Amidst potentially destabilizing forces, the stabilizing influence of humility and self-simplification taps into a base of vital resilience, rooted in that which is unshakeable because it is the source of all shaking. Held in counterpoise to the continual aim of becoming, this base provides the stillness beneath motion, the tranquility that steadies action. Grounding out beneath the biopsychosocial construal process, it offers a sanctuary of deep rest—a stabilizing respite to recharge in the unwavering depth of Immanent Being.

​

With the purification of the psychic tier, the duality between Witness and the body-mind complex is resolved through the immanence of the field within. Yet a subtle duality remains—between inner and outer. Integrated within, we may still feel enclosed: vital, yet not ensouled. However perceptive or attentive we become, something may still be missing—a luminous connectivity, a radial openness that spans self and world. Whether or not this immanence is embodied, the light of soul already beckons.

 

​

Soul

 

From infancy and into toddlerhood, a sense of self, or 1st person subjectivity, begins to dawn in a magical period interfused with a dreamlike subconscious where reality and fantasy remain inextricably blended. Rich in sensory delight, an emotional connection with our environment opens as colors, shapes, sounds, and textures are explored with wonder. The seat of subjective awareness, this first-person perspective immerses us in the quality of our internal state, experienced through simple sensations unmediated by value-laden relational or conceptual overlays. Consider the warmth of sunlight on the skin, or the grounding sensation of bare feet pressing into cold, damp earth. Or imagine the refreshing coolness of water on your tongue as it quenches thirst (1P), aligning one’s awareness with this primary sensation as it arises, prior to psychological engagement or any meaningful relationship with water (2P), or to a mere utilitarian or objective detachment, where water as H₂O is treated as an object defined by its chemical composition and properties (3P). Bringing ourselves back to these moments of raw sensory immediacy draws us into the pre-reflective openness of native subjectivity, free from emotional oscillations, where awareness resonates with more harmonic states—love, joy, and peace. 

​

As we develop from our earliest years, overlays form, and we begin to exchange the illumination of the world’s beauty for the familiarity of memory and expectation. Though beauty still surrounds us, it no longer touches us in the same way. A subtle veil settles in. The dissonance need not bring anguish; more often, it arrives as a quiet dullness—a flattening of tone, a kind of exile. Overindulgence offers no remedy. Pleasure dulls. What is called for is not stimulation, but receptivity—to open once more to subtle joy, to trace the ray of light across a living span.

​

As we settle into the neutrality of primary subjectivity, subtle currents of bliss bubble up from within. Polyvalent in nature, these emanations of light ripple outward, bridging self and other, one and many, in a radial connection as though emanating from the bosom. It recalls shimmering dew in a field, where sunlight refracts into an iridescent rainbow—each droplet a world unto itself, glistening with quiet coherence. Like the jewels in Indra’s Net, each moment reflects and resonates with every other, revealing the intricate, interconnected beauty of existence. In this alignment, distinctions harmonize into a shared flow, like a fractal dance. Within this radiant network, embraced through open-hearted connectivity, we no longer mistake the light-bearer for the light-source as the source of well-being. 

​

The quality of our inner state imbues all aspects of life, subtly suffusing our perception and keeping us in touch with a broader resonance. Radially connected by the light of the soul, what we open ourselves to becomes paramount, as our resonances—whether shaped by conscious choice or inherited from culture and temperament—form the luminous backdrop of our reality. Vibrationally mediated, the frequencies we attune to naturally synchronize—entraining subtle energy patterns, like a mood or atmosphere, experienced not as content, but as feeling-tones and, more broadly, setting a vibrational carrier that gently infuses every affair, casting a soft backlight on our connection to others and the affective landscape.

​

Inspired by the harmonic refinement of music, architectural grace, and the loveliness of manner, the theatre of art emerges as the quintessential expression of the soul. Beauty manifests in many ways: in the kindness of habit, in nature’s serene canopy, softly filtering light into a mosaic, reflected in the grandeur of stained-glass cathedrals. Aesthetic judgment, predicated on pleasure and delight, reconciles us with life by unifying the ideal with the real, and the "ought" with the "is." In moments of aesthetic arrest, through epiphonic suffusion, we see through the object or scene to the light that imbues it. Radiance reveals itself as the medium through which transcendence and immanence are made expressive. As the light of soul shows the way, it may open up the mind to new perspective and subtly orient the psyche toward a more refined alignment.

​

Alignment with the light harmonizes otherwise disparate elements and occasions into sheer radiance, offering harmonic resolution. Suffusing linear perspectives and cyclical perception alike, it orchestrates a meshwork where each moment is interconnected by the loving and divine heart, emanating from the soul. Through harmonical orientation, connection with this luminous thread is maintained—resonating throughout the patterns of our lives. For the divine light does not merely accumulate with the passing years or return with the seasons, but radiates in every moment, if we have cultivated attunement. The mind progresses linearly through time, the psyche moves within seasonal and generational cycles, and just as a radius extends from centre to circumference, it resolves line and sphere into a single radiant whole—transfusing all things as sunlight does, effortlessly and without division.

​

Aspirational in nature, the benediction provided by beauty emits an energy pattern by which the subtle perfume of the divine is apprehended as it suffuses our awareness—and by which our inner state might resonate and find its way. Drawing upon what is possible were we to properly live according to our ideal, a beatific, utopic vision emerges, consecrated in our collective imagination as the proverbial Edenic garden—an allegory of efflorescence, its vaulting breadth illuminated by Radiant Heart.

​

Native to early life, before overlays accrue, a felt connection to the world once overflowed. With time, that resonance may become veiled—not through rupture, but through accumulation: of tension, distraction, misalignment. Yet the underlying tone remains. When we are whole within, a fullness wells up, from which the heart may pour forth. Through such alignment—attuned to the divine in all things—the possibility opens for radiant unification. When the subtle tier is illuminated, the field emanates from the heart. Translucent, the inner feels radially connected to the outer, yet a very subtle duality remains between emptiness and form.

 

 

Spirit 

 

Pause for a moment. In the silence beneath this sentence, notice the space within which these words appear and disappear. There is no “you” observing or “me” explaining—only this awareness in which all arises and dissolves. This is not a perspective, but the absence of perspective: a 0-person unicity prior to division, where the boundaries between self and other, subject and object, fall away. What remains is not a personal identity, but a non-local field—seamless and indivisible, without circumference or fixed center. Here, the ultimate mystery unfolds—beyond observation, interaction, or resonance—revealing the groundless ground of being.

 

Spirit is not merely the highest for serving the lowest, nor the most whole for integrating the most parts, it is the omnivalent condition from which—and in which—all things arise. Each tier or layer of existence acts as a step down, a lens through which different aspects of spirit are revealed. These layers do not restrict spirit; rather, they enable the unfolding of the manifold richness of being. Through the differentiation of form—gross and subtle—spirit’s fullness is experienced in multiplicity, yet remains undisturbed and unified. Spirit pervades all, being the essence that reconciles dualities and multiplicities, encompassing the highest and the lowest, the parts and the whole, the one and the many, emptiness and form.

​

Independent of cognitive, conative, and affective modes, and therefore bypassing any intermediary of thought, sensation, or feeling, identification with reality itself is unmediated, at least insofar as this can be disclosed within the limitations of human form. Unlike the transient fluctuations of personal experience, spirit is constant—the unadulterated suchness of reality itself, free from the impositions of conceptual constructs, narrative patterns, or even subtle vibrational influences.

​

Whereas the findings of science are transmitted through objective truths (3rd-person approach), the teachings of religion through moral concern (2nd-person approach), and the expressions of art through subjective beauty (1st-person approach), the revelation of spirit follows the pathless way. Not a domain among others, but the field of existence itself, spirit is accessed directly through contemplative awareness. Revelatory, the self is not refined but released—into an all-encompassing, undivided field, in the liberation of one’s own absence.

​

Spirit is permeant in nature. Formless in essence, spirit is all-pervading—penetrating all barriers, breaking all frames of reference, defying any attempt at confinement. As the permeant condition, spirit is the fullness of all appearance and the hidden coherence within every pattern of orientation—conceived by the mind, enacted by the psyche, and felt by the soul. As that within which all arises and beyond which nothing exists, spirit expresses both the freedom of utter autonomy and the intimacy of perfect communion—revealing the interpenetration of emptiness and form.

​

Accessed through the sacrifice of unconditional surrender, the very sense of self must be released. Though faint remains of ignorance (avidya lesha and avidya vasanas) and habitual patterns (samskaras) may linger, a quiet abiding remains as the source point—even upon the dissolution of the separate self-sense, plunged into the transparent, yet irreducibly mysterious Permeant Beyond.

​

Though the separate self-sense dissolves into transparency—permeated by the formless field—the unfolding of life does not cease. The world remains, and so too do the strata of being. Prior to full dissolution, there may be partial unifications: the apotheosis of mental ascent, the resilient base of the psyche, the breadth of the soul’s luminous span. Alongside these, one may sense the foundational peace that underpins existence—not only in the unconscious fusion of the newborn, but as a quiet undercurrent available throughout life.

​

Even after complete unification, the work of refinement continues. The mind may still grow in clarity, the psyche in integration, and the soul in alignment. These are not lesser movements, but resonant echoes—coherences within the world of form that remain relevant even when spirit stands transparent. The unconditioned may be realized, but the conditioned persists—offering itself again and again to be met.

 

​

Absolute (Essential) cf. Comprehensive (Subsidiary) Approaches

 

Traditions of awakening vary not only in method but in metaphysical emphasis. Some aim directly at the Absolute, stripping away intermediary states and developmental scaffolding in pursuit of what is unconditioned. Others adopt a more comprehensive view—one that embraces the full range of human experience as a necessary expression of spirit. If spirit is living a human life, then life itself presses us to reckon with its multidimensional unfolding. Mind, psyche, and soul are not obstacles to be bypassed, but vessels through which spirit is made known. The unmanifest Absolute may be changeless, yet our experience of its expression is layered, contextual, and evolving.

 

Each approach isolates a different aspect of the mystery it seeks to resolve. Essentialist approaches focus on the immediacy of spirit itself, untouched by the fluctuations of thought, emotion, or state. In Zen—particularly within the Rinzai tradition—this orientation is expressed in the radical imperative to break through conceptual thinking and directly realize one’s true nature. Sudden awakening (satori) is emphasized over gradual cultivation or psychological integration. The seeker is confronted as the final veil. While the importance of post-awakening maturation is acknowledged within the tradition, the primary emphasis remains on the immediacy and directness of realization. Tony Parsons takes this even further, rejecting not only the seeker, but the path, the process, and the very notion of individuality. In his radical presentation, there is no awakening, no integration—only the timeless, impersonal Absolute, ever already so.

​

This approach, one might say, plays to its strength. And while it may strike some as austere or dismissive of the subtleties of human unfolding, it serves a purpose. Indeed, such momentum—such uncompromising attitude—may at times be necessary. Without it, we risk circling endlessly within the orbit of selfhood, sinking into patterns of narcissism, avoidance, or spiritual self-deception. In this sense, the starkness of the essentialist approach can act as a cleansing flame—one that burns through the very structures seen to bind us to a fixed and illusory sense of self. From this vantage, the primary motivation is liberation: to break free from the confining loop of identity, thought, and striving, and awaken to what is always already the case.

​

In contrast, comprehensive approaches seek not only to realize the Absolute, but to affirm its expression through form. Kashmir Shaivism, for instance, regards the play of consciousness (lila) not as a distraction from spirit but as Siva's own divine sport—a spontaneous expression of the glorious fullness (purnata) of consciousness. Rather than negating multiplicity, it celebrates it as the textured unfolding of the divine. Awakening, in this view, includes not only a transcendence of life’s particulars but a return to them illumined—where every form, feeling, and function is seen as a radiant reflection of the same indivisible reality. Likewise, in certain strands of Mahayana Buddhism—such as Hua-yen—the interpenetration of all phenomena is seen as the very body of enlightenment itself, where form is not other than emptiness, and emptiness not other than form.

​

This chapter, too, could be said to unfold in the manner of a comprehensive approach. In a sense, such an approach can enfold both essentialist and modal expressions of spirit—so long as it points uncompromisingly to spirit, without subordinating the Absolute to the processes of becoming. The Absolute is not shaped by conditions, but neither is it estranged from their unfolding. Although given separate treatments here, the differentiations of mind, integrations of psyche, and emanations of soul are each modulated expressions of permeant spirit. 

 

​

Conclusion

 

First-, second-, and third-person modes of understanding disclose vital dimensions of experience, yet none yield the mystery without remainder. These perspectives are structured expressions of the self—conditioned approaches to what exceeds all vantage. What lies beyond is not another perspective, but a unicity: the dissolution of all positions into the undivided field.

​

In exploring mind, psyche, soul, and spirit, we have not imposed a linear ascent but distinguished dimensions through which the Absolute becomes variously disclosed. Whether approached through the propositional clarity of mind, the integrative wholeness of psyche, the radial resonance of soul, or the unmediated permeance of spirit, each reveals a tone by which alignment may be felt and the deeper ground approached. Though first encountered as differentiated functions of the growing self, these become dimensions through which purification unfolds—each culminating in its respective terminus: Transcendental Consciousness, Immanent Being, Radiant Heart, and Permeant Beyond.

​

From the vantage of the specialized mind, these domains may appear as separate systems. But through the psyche’s intermediary depth, their interdependence becomes vital. From the soul’s subtle luminosity, they radially interconnect, resonant across all experience. And ultimately, from the viewless reality of spirit, the unified field permeates them all, as the living truth of what is.